Why the article is helpful
- Explores the use of graphics on ballots and its implications
- Arguments for and against graphic usage
- Designing to accommodate cognitive disabilities
This article explores the use of graphical elements, such as icons and alerts symbols, on ballots and their usability and accessibility implications with those who have cognitive disabilities. The authors provided arguments both for and against graphical usage since certain elements may enhance usability. It further explores designing to accommodate cognitive disabilities including reading ability, verbal comprehension, memory and attention, visual comprehension, mathematics comprehension, and problem-solving ability. It is urged that more empirical studies are needed to further validate these conclusions.
Links to article
Smith, B., Laskowski, S., & Lowry, S. (2009). Implications of graphics on usability and accessibility for the voter. Paper presented at E-Voting and Identity: Second International Conference, Luxembourg. 54–74. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04135-8_4